NATO’s Russian Roulette
byNATO’s expansion has had profound implications for global security, geopolitics & Ukraine’s future.
NATO’s expansion has had profound implications for global security, geopolitics & Ukraine’s future.
For the present, it appears that negotiations will be less about pressuring Putin to bring a just end to the war he started, than forcing Ukraine to give in to the Russian leader’s demands.
Two wars–the Russia-Ukraine war and the Israel-Palestine war–expose the hypocrisy of global powers.
The crisis of the UN and the multilateral system has been built in recent decades.
The Ukraine war may be a harbinger of a new & more dangerous world regarding nonproliferation.
Appearing unable to prevent Ukrainian attacks in and on Crimea exposes a significant personal vulnerability of Putin’s regime.
Providing Ukraine with cluster weapons could serve to destigmatize them & runs counter to international efforts to end their use.
To many nations in the Global South, calls to uphold the ‘rules-based order’ appear to serve only the foreign policy interests of the great powers, rather than the global public good.
How the war plays out in 2023 will also reveal how credible the West’s determination to stand up to bullies really is.
Sorting out corruption will remain a key factor in the war – how and when it ends, and what kind of Ukraine will emerge from it.
Who in the West would be seriously injured if Ukraine was neutral, like Switzerland?
Major world powers use the rhetoric of ‘democracy’ and ‘human rights’ only when it suits them.
How do we understand what we witnessed in 2022?
Zelensky has not stopped putting out impractical formulae for a cease-fire.
Dictators often meet their ends through inadvertent overreach. So, too, Putin’s new fragility stems from his own choices.