Scientific Temper Is Crucial For India’s Progress
byFor India to prosper, it must prioritise scientific inquiry, rational analysis, and a commitment to truth.
For India to prosper, it must prioritise scientific inquiry, rational analysis, and a commitment to truth.
Darwin’s legacy will continue to shape our understanding of life, evolution, and the mysteries of the natural world for generations to come.
The Chernobyl and Bhopal tragedies underscore the need for robust regulatory frameworks & strong emergency preparedness.
The 2025 German election results have forever altered the political landscape of the country, with far-reaching consequences for both domestic & foreign policy.
The Supreme Court must resist the urge to become an enforcer of moral codes and instead reaffirm its role as the ultimate protector of fundamental rights.
For the present, it appears that negotiations will be less about pressuring Putin to bring a just end to the war he started, than forcing Ukraine to give in to the Russian leader’s demands.
De-dollarisation will be driven by technology & necessity.
If the US joins China and Russia in violating recognised borders, the international, rights-based order could be in danger.
Science has no colour. However, it does have a social, economic, and historical context. Facts, numbers, statistics are often context dependent.
Donald Trump’s tarrifs on Canada, Mexico and China could start a global trade war that could create global unstability.
We must revisit Plato & Socrates’s postulates on democracy to prevent it from backsliding.
Madhu Bhaduri, a former Indian Foreign Service officer, joined the Aam Aadmi Party as the founding member. But she was disillusioned with its corruption, lack of transparency & racist attitudes.
The Squid Games universe presents the essence of the neoliberal democratic order in another existential sense: the commodification of life.
Will Trump’s vision of a stable international order with clearly defined spheres of influence for the great powers of the day—the US, China and Russia—emerge?
Dehumanisation not only morally excludes the dehumanised but also the dehumaniser, eventually, into a trap of cognitive dissonance and moral quandary.